Tung Chung New Town Extension Study – Stage 2 Public Engagement
Planning Department and CEDD are preparing to expand Tung Chung. But despite the existing popularity of cycling in the town, cycling and cycle tracks are downplayed. (There are bike icons on the cover, and a mention of ‘cycle tracks along the waterfront promenade’, but nothing in the planning principles or other important parts of the document.)
We need to make sure that cycling is integrated into the heart of planning of new Tung Chung, to all destinations. That includes roads and tracks that facilitate getting efficiently around the area by bike, parking (residential and spread across district).
First, see the Stage 1 study (you may need to use Internet Explorer to view it properly)
How to get involved, under the Stage 2 Public Engagement:
(1) ‘Community Workshop’
22 June 2013 (Saturday), 2:00pm – 5:30pm (need to pre-register by 20 June)
Venue: HK Federation of Education Workers Wong Cho Bau Secondary School (map)
(2) ‘Public Forum’
13 July 2013 (Saturday), 2:00pm – 5:30pm (need to pre-register by 11 July)
Venue: HK Federation of Education Workers Wong Cho Bau Secondary School (map)
(It’s not clear what happens at these two events, or the difference between them)
(3) Make a written submission, either via their dull form (eg. ‘Do you want continuous walkways?’) with options to write your own answers;
OR just write to PlanD and CEDD, at:
skisdpo@pland.gov.hk and tungchung@cedd.gov.hk (deadline: 21 July – but do it now!)
Please email us at info@hkcyclingalliance.org if you’re going to a public meeting. If you write, please cc us.
You can phone them at:
PlanD: Sai Kung and Islands Districts Planning Office, 2158 6177 (fax: 2367 2976)
CEDD: HK Island and Islands Development Office, 2231 4408 (fax: 2577 5040)
The Stage One study
The Stage One study includes decorative icons and images of bikes, and mentions cycle tracks in the text. But why isn’t cycling among the planning principles or the transport section, and why are there no details at all of the ‘cycle tracks’ – they’re not even shown on the map? What are we being offered?
Cycling should be at the heart of the new Tung Chung, not merely window dressing.
Although the ‘cycling is leisure’ mantra is not trumpeted in this study, government is still very reluctant to recognise cycling as transport, let alone integrate it into planning. So cycling is mentioned (even ‘commuting’, slightly), to look good, but actually left vague. Without a firm commitment to build Tung Chung around cycling connectivity, we’ll end up with the same old disjointed, badly designed paths and no supporting effort to promote and enable functional cycling.
Don’t believe the pretty pictures; look at the text.
In the study’s 15 pages, here is what we get:
- 海濱長廊及連綿的公園都會附設單車徑，以推廣單車成為區內的環保交通工具 Provide cycle tracks along the waterfront promenade and linear parks to promote cycling as a green commuting tool in Tung Chung
[what about cycling everywhere else? tracks can be good, and people cycle on roads and mixed-use area too. So enable cycle traffic flow – no pointless barriers or dismount signs. Encourage sensible sharing of space. ]
- 主要交通及社區設施附近提供足夠單車泊位以鼓勵居民使用單車 Provide adequate cycle parking space near major transport and community facilities to encourage cycling
[But people need to park at any locality, not just large bike parks at major facilities. What about local parking near any shops or other places people go? Eg. enable individual parking at most lampposts, signposts and railings.]
